Cloud Platform
This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This idea is planned for the 8.1.1 release in March of 2025. Thank you for confirming the priority!
Hi Randy, it would be great if this could be included in the March 2025 release
Thank you for this idea. We can implement this if you can confirm the priority of this update. We would like to confirm the priority with you on our next collaborative call and then we review next steps. Please share as well here if you can.
We also need this feature so that we can manage the access effectively.
We want to add multiple roles in Applications > Application_Name > Processes > Process: Application_Process > configuration > Required Role and currently we can add one role in "Required Role" instead we want to be able to select multiple roles.
We had raised a case TS016602110 for the same.
This RFE can be implemented to allow/accept multiple roles, however, Dev team thinks its an expensive change. It would require changes in multiple places and has import/export considerations.
Can you please clarify the priority of this RFE? I will check with our team to see if we have a meeting scheduled to discuss this with you as well.
Need to discuss the priority of this idea with the team. This will be a significant change to support. We can meet to discuss hopefully soon. Thank you...
Met with team on 02-07-2024 and I am providing answers for team to this idea.
We have some follow-up questions around this enhancement that we would like your input on.
1) Does requiring multiple roles work as an 'and' or an 'or'? We assumed 'or' but are not sure. (It is an 'or' for this use case)
2) We do not think we should do anything around removing visibility, we do not currently have permissions on application processes to control their visibility independent from the application. Is this ok with you? (we would like you to test this - if someone is in role a and someone in role a and b. if process is set to role b only, the second user will be only one to see the process we believe). use of checkboxes to select multiple roles would be nice.
Please provide your response to the questions above and we can continue to progress this enhancement.
Thank you for this idea. We are creating an internal discussion topic to review this with our development team. We will review this once more on an upcoming meeting with you as well.