Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Not under consideration
Workspace UrbanCode
Categories Deploy
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 10, 2023

Role configuration Server Configuration Manage Security should be more granular

At the moment the entitlement Serveucd-corerity has far too much access. In our team we need new starters to be able to view role configurations, team configurations as part of their training but in general I would expect separate entitlements for manage teams, manage roles, manage tokens, manage token restrictions and options for view on each of these entitlements so we can put privileged access behind breakglass.

Idea priority Low
  • Admin
    Randy Langehennig
    Reply
    |
    Oct 10, 2024

    Thank you for confirming and we will place this one in 'Not under consideration'. Please do open a new Idea if a need arises in the future. Thank you!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 1, 2024

    Hi Randy,

    We are happy for you to close this idea. It's been a while since it was raised and the engineer that raised this idea has since left the team. If we find that an enhancement like this could benefit us in future, we'll raise a new IBM Idea.

  • Admin
    Randy Langehennig
    Reply
    |
    Jul 31, 2024

    From our meeting on July 31, 2024, your internal team will meet on August 27, 2024 to discuss this Idea and will then get back to IBM with the details. In the meantime, we will keep this Idea on hold.

  • Admin
    Randy Langehennig
    Reply
    |
    Nov 9, 2023

    Per our conversation on Wednesday, Nov 8, 2023, please provide more specific permissions that are important to you. This will help us in decomposing this for an implementation (per our developer's request). If you can provide a definitive list would be very helpful to our development team.

  • Admin
    Randy Langehennig
    Reply
    |
    Aug 4, 2023

    Hi Edward, could you please provide some more specific requirements for us regarding this RFE? The development team is asking for more information. If it would be helpful, we could schedule a call with you and our development team to discuss this. I believe Mark Beszant at IBM could help with coordination of the meeting. Thank you!

  • Admin
    Randy Langehennig
    Reply
    |
    Jul 19, 2023

    Thank you for submitting this RFE. We see that this would be beneficial to help provide controls for a "Junior Administrator" without giving them the ability to manage or edit the team-based security settings accidentally. Our team will review this. We would like to meet with the Lloyds team to get a priority list of your RFEs so we can work to address them in terms of priority. Thank you!

    1 reply