Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Ideas

    Showing 12 of 2044

    Masking specific field values directly at the test level in DevOps Test Integrations and APIs (DTIA)

    Currently, DTIA does not support masking the field values directly at the test level. It does support data masking method at both at schema and non-schema levels which can be applied only when you attempt recording traffic. Ie; Currently DTIA supp...
    11 months ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 1 Future consideration

    Customize the inbuilt report generation functionality in the DTIA

    DTIA now provides a fixed reporting interface under "Results Gallery" section and does not allow users to modify it. For example, you would like to add additional columns in existing default table.
    4 months ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 0 Not under consideration

    Pass tag values into the "Notes" column of the default DTIA report that appears under "Result Gallery"

    There is an existing 'Notes' column in the default DTIA report that you see under "Results Gallery". DTIA should allow users to tag or populate values in this column for each store or transaction preferably allowing the test executions label thems...
    4 months ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 0 Future consideration

    WASPreUpgrade command allowed on the same version

    Currently the WASPreUpgrade command is not allowed on the same version, so we must have two different versions installed on the same server or IBM i and run the command from the new version, entering the old version as a parameter. In scenarios of...
    almost 2 years ago in WebSphere Migration Toolkits 2 Submitted

    Remove results db requirement for suite results publisher files in RIT/DTIA

    Because of PCI data concerns, our testers don't want to enable the results database, but they would still like to report execution metrics using the results publisher functionality. This could be facilitated by adding a 4th Attach option on the Cu...
    over 1 year ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 1 Future consideration

    Provide support for detecting custom tag / attribute in .jsp files

    There might be other customers like us that depend on some proprietary presentation framework, that provides capabilities through some combination of special tags / attribute values in .jsp files embedded in the applications. If TA data collector ...
    almost 4 years ago in WebSphere Migration Toolkits 0 Future consideration

    WASPreUpgrade + WASPostUpgrade take days to run when processing large files

    WASPreUpgrade and WASPostUpgrade allows a migration between two WAS versions, e.g. 8.0 to 9.0 or 8.5 to 9.0. The WASPreUpgrade process effectively exports the data from the original profile. The WASPostUpgrade effectively imports the data from the...
    about 4 years ago in WebSphere Migration Toolkits 2 Not under consideration

    RIT Database DB2 Mutual SSL / Certificate Authentication

    When defining a database connection in Physical View for a z/OS DB2 database, it's currently not possible to configure Mutual SSL / Certificate Authentication as described for example on this page: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/db2/11.5?topic=sudsdj...
    about 2 years ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 1 Future consideration

    can the Migration Toolkit for Application Binaries and/or the Migration Toolkit for Application Source be updated to look for setContextClassLoader calls and warn of potential class loader problems

    There are slight differences within WAS and Liberty from a classloading perspective. Sometimes when applications are migrated from WAS to Liberty. You run into some TCCL issues. The solution was to delete the line of code where the context class l...
    about 2 years ago in WebSphere Migration Toolkits 0 Planned for future release

    Mixed mode support in RTW

    Sometimes applications use Windows common dialogs and mixed domains. Rational Functional Tester natively supported this, and this feature should be put into Rational Test Workbench so that these dialogs can be accessed, and not blindly via keystro...
    over 2 years ago in DevOps Automation / Test Workbench 2 Future consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.