Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Workspace UrbanCode
Categories Deploy
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 21, 2023

RELATED IDEAS

Proactive Toxic combination validation

Hello Team,

User level validation while adding to roles to avoid toxic combination proactively

Example

User1 is part of platoform Mgr role, So user1 should never be part of deployer role.

Can we have the check in place while adding the toxic roles

Msg " Can not add user1 in deployer role , user1 is already part of build mgr role which is a toxic combination."

Thanks

Jinesh PT

Idea priority High
  • Admin
    Osman Burucu
    Reply
    |     Mar 22, 2023

    As part of the review process, we strive to be transparent about our intentions with each enhancement suggestion. The offering team has carefully reviewed this idea and has decided that it does not fit into our current plans, or the idea has aged or has been implemented, so the idea will be closed. The idea will be kept in IBM's ideas repository and may still be voted on. It might be reassessed or reopened for additional feedback in the future. We value your feedback and thank you for allowing us the privilege of partnering with you in developing our products.

    Analysis has provided insight that this is not possible. As mentioned in previous comment, UCD does not know the semantics of the roles and it is not possible to implement this type of change.

  • Admin
    Osman Burucu
    Reply
    |     Mar 17, 2023

    UCD does not know the semantics behind the roles, so does not "know" what a toxic combination would be.

    Could you give me more insight, why you need that and how it should work?


  • Admin
    Osman Burucu
    Reply
    |     Feb 22, 2023

    Thank You for your input.

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.