Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform

This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 22, 2016
Merged idea

This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit TWAS-I-131 Provide Daily Log File Handler for WebSphere Liberty Profile.

Allow to roll over log files on a daily basis Merged

Our product "Blueworks Live" (cloud offer of IBM BPM) used to run on jetty, and we can roll over the logs on daily basis, such as the messages.log, trace.log, and http access logs. After we move to liberty platform, we were told the roll over only based on the file size.

Idea priority High
RFE ID 85825
RFE Duplicate of 83861
RFE Product WebSphere Application Server
  • Guest
    May 31, 2016

    Yes, this is a duplicate of request 83861, but the priority assigned to 83861 is too low. For us, this is a high priority and is a significant roadblock to effective problem-determination. Thanks.