Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive a notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

If you encounter any issues accessing the Ideas portals, please send email describing the issue to ideasibm@us.ibm.com for resolution.

For more information about IBM's Ideas program visit ibm.com/ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on May 17, 2019

Filter and validate option in stub needs to be configurable

Currently when we record HTTP events and create a stub, automatically all the fields gets enabled with filter condition and if there are some optional fields or we want to validate some fields instead of filter, it is really difficult especially if the payload is very big.

Idea priority Urgent
RFE ID 133040
RFE URL
RFE Product Rational Test Workbench
  • Guest
    Oct 16, 2019

    Although the theme of this request is consistent with our business strategy, it is not committed to the release that is currently under development.

  • Guest
    May 29, 2019

    Hi,

    Based on the payload, we want to decide whether we should enable filter on parent or validate specific field, at present all the XML elements are added as filter and assuming we want to implement regular expressions etc and if the payload is bigger, it takes really long time to make the changes.

    If we have an editor which the complete xml properly and if there is an option to enable filter/validate, it will reduce our operational efforts.

    Regards,
    Mahesh

  • Guest
    May 28, 2019

    We will be looking at ways we can make editing messages less opinionated, which will help with working with optional fields, large message payloads, etc.

    In terms of the request to make it easier to validate an incoming message for a stub, could you please share the use case for this?