Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive a notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

If you encounter any issues accessing the Ideas portals, please send email describing the issue to for resolution.

For more information about IBM's Ideas program visit

Status Delivered
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 9, 2017
Merged idea

This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit RBF-I-123 RTWW - Add data to DataPool, while creating a data pool reference.

RTWW - DP variables need to be "explicity" marked in the script Merged

Currently in RTWW, when user maps a value in the script to a DP variable. It is not been displayed / updated in the script.
Ex: in the attached screenshot, David is been mapped to a DP varible
However when a tester view the script, he is left with an impression that David is been selected for the passenger. However in reality the data is coming from the DP, where there are multiple users.

It would be easy to review the testscript, if the DP fields are differentiated from the other fields. Comparing the same with RFT, in RFT, it is clearly marked as dpString("richTextBox1").

Idea priority Medium
RFE ID 103565
RFE Product Rational Test Workbench
  • Guest
    Apr 13, 2022

    The feature that is described in this request is a candidate for a future release

  • Guest
    Sep 8, 2017

    A preliminary evaluation of this request indicates that it is consistent with our business strategy. Further evaluation of this RFE is underway.
    Will investigate colour coding the test step itself.

  • Guest
    Apr 9, 2017

    Attachment (Description)