Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 25, 2016

RSARTE: Renaming a redefined operation also renames operation in base class

Renaing a redefined operation also renames that operation in the base class. This is confusing for the developer, show a warning message in this case

Idea priority Medium
RFE ID 85955
RFE URL
RFE Product Rational Software Architect Real Time Edition
  • Admin
    Osman Burucu
    Reply
    |
    Feb 27, 2024

    As part of the review process, we strive to be transparent about our intentions with each enhancement suggestion. Since the creation time of this ideas the product has evolved and your input may have been incorporated into newer releases.

    Should this be not the case, please feel free to recreate it in our new Idea workspace for DevOps Model and Code RealTime (Please find here a blog how to achieve that: https://community.ibm.com/community/user/wasdevops/blogs/osman-burucu/2024/01/04/how-to-add-new-idea-for-devops-model-architect-and)


    The idea will be kept in IBM's ideas repository and may still be voted on. It might be reassessed or reopened for additional feedback in the future. We value your feedback and thank you for allowing us the privilege of partnering with you in developing our products.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 22, 2017

    -

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 20, 2016

    Please provide more background to why you think the current behavior is unwanted. The current behavior was explicitly requested by other users, so if we should change this it must be done using a preference.
    Redefined operations should have consistent names. If you want to make it into a different operation (without affecting the base operation) the correct way is to first make it not redefined (easiest to do by pressing the Clear button in the Properties view) and then change its name.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 2, 2016

    This behavior was explicitly requested by other users, so if we should change this it must be done using a preference. But it would be interesting to know why it's unwanted to update the name of the base operation. Redefined operations should have consistent names. If the user wants to make it into a different operation (without affecting the base operation) the correct way is to first make it not redefined (easiest to do by pressing the Clear button in the Properties view) and then change its name.