Skip to Main Content
Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Future consideration
Workspace WebSphere Liberty
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 2, 2026

Add OAuth 2.0 mTLS support to Liberty’s native oauth-2.0 provider, specifically around RFC 8705 behavior

For our IBM OpenPages product, one of our Customers in Brazil is especially escalating the need for OAuth 2.0 mTLS support

Here is the internal Slack discussion for your reference: https://ibm-cloudplatform.slack.com/archives/C30NGTBFS/p1770919784879359

Our current understanding is that the Liberty OAuth provider does not support RFC 8705 and does not issue any kind of certificate-bound tokens.

We do not have any realistic option to provide Native OAuth support outside of through WLP, otherwise we would have to start over and build our own OAuth provider with mTLS from scratch ourselves and have it work outside of WLP security enforcement

Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Jun 3, 2026

    Could you please also analyze and provide information regarding support (or planned support) for DPoP - Demonstrating Proof of Possession, as defined in RFC 9449 (published September 2023)?