Cloud Platform


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Platform products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Heritage

The Add Links dialog should display requirements' properties

Using the 'Requirements Management Integration Feature' (delivered with Design Room ONE) and the 'Add link' dialog in RSAD, it is not easy to survey and distinguish between the requirements without being able to view the attribures. You can hover ...
over 3 years ago in Heritage / Software Architect Designer Future consideration

be able to tell the model.compiler what type/size of indent to use for the in model code snipits when generating c++

useful for code reviewers this used to be done (by default) w 10.2 /* ;rt-indent: 2;rt-indent-char-sp; */ but with 12.x it doesn't generate any indent /* ;rt-indent: 0;rt-indent-char-sp; */ 10.2 void Namespace::Class::Operation( int variable ) { ...
almost 2 years ago in Heritage / Model RealTime Future consideration

rcleartool UCM CQ operations

Description:rcleartool supports multiple functions in ClearCase such as deliver and rebase.Under a UCM enabled environment, commands such as those listed that interface with ClearQuest do not function. rcleartool prints out indicating that the use...
almost 9 years ago in Heritage / ClearCase Future consideration

ClearQuest EXEs not signed by IBM

We're trying to work with our security teams to create policies that will allow ClearQuest to run at a higher level of permission elevation in our environments. Software on our user's machines is very tightly managed to not allow registry updates ...
almost 9 years ago in Heritage / ClearQuest Future consideration

Support Group Managed Service Accounts

Allow the atria location broker service to be configured to run as a group managed service account during installation on windows. This can be done by allowing a blank password during installation.
over 5 years ago in Heritage / ClearCase Future consideration

RAD version that supports JDK11 for runtime analysis

since we are evaluting code quality through RAD , Application developed with jdk 11
over 3 years ago in Heritage / Application Developer Future consideration

clearmake -C gnu should support syntax for handling multiple targets with a single rule like gmake 4.2

With the current gmake 4.2 a - long discussed - syntax feature for handling a rule of multiple targets built by the same rule was released. a b c :& build-me As a result, this is the same as in solaris make done viaa + b + c: build-me Besides ...
almost 6 years ago in Heritage / ClearCase Future consideration

Separate build messages for multiple TC builds

Make it possible to build several TCs in parallel and report build messages in a way so it can be understood to which TC build each message belongs, both while the builds are running and after they have finished.
almost 2 years ago in Heritage / Model RealTime Future consideration

organize sources should support non-capsule transformations

for capsule components it presumable builds a dependency tree based on relationships from the top capsule non-capsule components don't have a 'top capsule', but some way of designating the 'main-class' should be able to work similarly
almost 2 years ago in Heritage / Model RealTime Future consideration

Better vizualisation of added and removed attachments in modify-mode

After adding and removing several attachments to a record in the web-client,it not comprehensibly which attachments have been added, which have been removed and which are actually stored on the record. For a better visibility we would like to have...
about 8 years ago in Heritage / ClearQuest Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.