We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive a notification on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
If you encounter any issues accessing the Ideas portals, please send email describing the issue to firstname.lastname@example.org for resolution.
For more information about IBM's Ideas program visit ibm.com/ideas.
Introduce a command to start a combined code and model level debugging session
Introduce a command to start a combined code and model level debugging session. The feature to start the model application directly using the model debugger is very useful but the engineer does not realise that the (Windows) application was not st...
Add live validation for Choice Points without an "else" branch
Please introduce live validation for Choice Points (CP) without an "else" branch. It is possible to trigger a transition to a CP and then have no condition which ensures you leave the CP - you land in no-mans land. Compare this with junction point...
Custom plugins are built based on using the provided APIs. It is a must to be able to redefine operations automatically but there is not such feature in the public API. We expect RTRedefineOperationCommand functionality to be part of the API.
Due to a corruption in model file, statemachine of a capsule was no longer displayable(exception is reported) and thus modifiable by user. No errors are reported while loading models, thus user assumes no problem. Users would like to be aware of m...
'Compare With'->'Each Other' for absorbed model fragments.
Model fragments have Compare With->Each Other however this option is missing for absorbed model fragments. As a workaround: Refactor->Create Fragment for both fragments does allow Compare With->Each Other
RSA-RTE: Target-RTS: Enable the use of exception handling with the TargetRTS
Using RSA-RTE 10.2.Request from our collegues in Poing.Enable the use of exception handling in RSA-RTE applications.Best example is a new / malloc which fails. On several places in the TargetRTS the return value is checked to be != 0. When excepti...
RSA-RTE: Target-RTS: Use more modern C++ mechanisms in TargetRTS
Using RSA-RTE 10.2.Use more modern mechanisms in the TargetRTS.The TargetRTS has been written in the ninetees (?) of the previous century. When extending the TargetRTS you see that all kinds of mechanism could be written much more simpler when STL...
RSA-RTE: Enable correct Team Compare for SVN Subclipse
Using RSA-RTE 10.2.When SVN Subclipse is used as an SCM system the Team Compare option mixes LHS and RHS. When I add functionality to my working model and then compare the changes with the repository baseline, the compare tool reports my new addit...
RSA-RTE: Cross model references not updated when refactoring these; create button
See PMR: TS001239396.Symptom: .emx files are not correctly updated immediately after a refactorHow to reproduce:Open any .emx model editor and go to the "References" tab. Press refresh.Next locate a dependency from another model to this model and ...
Annoying behavior when creating new port in structure diagram
Annoying behavior when creating new port in structure diagram: •Place a capsule on a structure diagram.•Drag a connector from one of that capsule's ports to an empty spot in the structure diagram.•RSARTE now asks what it should create: •Select "Cr...
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.